<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiction is Just Fiction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/</link>
	<description>&#34;by a partial, prejudiced, and ignorant historian,&#34; - Jane Austen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 02:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Banter: Word of Honor &#171; The Horizontal Yo-Yo</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10646</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Banter: Word of Honor &#171; The Horizontal Yo-Yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10646</guid>
		<description>[...] way.  My bet is she does.  And it wasn&#8217;t until I read her afterward that I thought about Ronnica&#8217;s post.  Of course Blackstock markets her books as fiction, but this is a perfect case of fiction not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way.  My bet is she does.  And it wasn&#8217;t until I read her afterward that I thought about Ronnica&#8217;s post.  Of course Blackstock markets her books as fiction, but this is a perfect case of fiction not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnica</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10632</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10632</guid>
		<description>@K-Lai: Totally agree.

@Jennifer:  Definitely something to being told a story.  Nothing wrong with that, we just have to remember that that&#039;s not all that&#039;s going on.

@Wickle:  The way you say that makes me feel very popular.  Regardless, I&#039;m thankful for each of my comments, whether I have 2 or 200 (okay, that&#039;s a dream)!

@Barry:  Agreed.  Personally, I&#039;m trying to figure out which style fits me better.  Probably will do both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@K-Lai: Totally agree.</p>
<p>@Jennifer:  Definitely something to being told a story.  Nothing wrong with that, we just have to remember that that&#8217;s not all that&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>@Wickle:  The way you say that makes me feel very popular.  Regardless, I&#8217;m thankful for each of my comments, whether I have 2 or 200 (okay, that&#8217;s a dream)!</p>
<p>@Barry:  Agreed.  Personally, I&#8217;m trying to figure out which style fits me better.  Probably will do both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Wallace</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10611</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10611</guid>
		<description>No.  Fiction cannot be just fiction.  If anything, it often has a more profound influence on our thinking and worldview than non-fiction--a point well made by G.K. Chesterton, C.S. Lewis, and others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  Fiction cannot be just fiction.  If anything, it often has a more profound influence on our thinking and worldview than non-fiction&#8211;a point well made by G.K. Chesterton, C.S. Lewis, and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wickle</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10603</link>
		<dc:creator>Wickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10603</guid>
		<description>Sorry if I&#039;m retreading ... I didn&#039;t read the 20 comments yet.

Can fiction be just fiction? Yes, but if it&#039;s any good, then it means something. So, the real answer is, &quot;Yes, if it&#039;s bad fiction or you don&#039;t understand it.&quot;

Everything that&#039;s really worth reading has a message to it and should affect us in one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if I&#8217;m retreading &#8230; I didn&#8217;t read the 20 comments yet.</p>
<p>Can fiction be just fiction? Yes, but if it&#8217;s any good, then it means something. So, the real answer is, &#8220;Yes, if it&#8217;s bad fiction or you don&#8217;t understand it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Everything that&#8217;s really worth reading has a message to it and should affect us in one way or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10600</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10600</guid>
		<description>Yes, fiction can be more than just fiction but it is.... just fiction.  I think so many of us like being told a story.

But we do have to be careful - the imagination is powerful.  Sometimes we can be subjected to things and have curiosities or thoughts planted in our mind that we didn&#039;t bargain for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, fiction can be more than just fiction but it is&#8230;. just fiction.  I think so many of us like being told a story.</p>
<p>But we do have to be careful &#8211; the imagination is powerful.  Sometimes we can be subjected to things and have curiosities or thoughts planted in our mind that we didn&#8217;t bargain for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floreta</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10599</link>
		<dc:creator>floreta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10599</guid>
		<description>i used to exclusively read non-fiction but lately have been rediscovering fiction. i&#039;ve heard of the shack but have yet to read it. books like that though.. like the celestine prophecy or the alchemist seem to be a different type of fiction. the inspirational fiction. of course, there is always a moral to a story :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i used to exclusively read non-fiction but lately have been rediscovering fiction. i&#8217;ve heard of the shack but have yet to read it. books like that though.. like the celestine prophecy or the alchemist seem to be a different type of fiction. the inspirational fiction. of course, there is always a moral to a story :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K-Lai</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10597</link>
		<dc:creator>K-Lai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10597</guid>
		<description>We have a mutual friend who gave a talk at Ministry Team (during the guy time) about thinking critically back when we were on MT together.  Not being negatively critical, but that we ought to critically examine every thought and idea, whether that be through works of fiction, TV, movies, art, conversation, etc.  IMHO, the idea of passively enjoying something &quot;just for entertainment&quot; is a veneer that is used to subversively shape people&#039;s views on life.

This isn&#039;t to say that fiction (and other forms of &quot;entertainment&quot;) shouldn&#039;t be enjoyable; only that if we delude ourselves into thinking that what we enjoy has absolutely no effect upon how we view the world, we will find ourselves espousing views that we never knew we had.

Stories and other works of fiction are awesome - and I wish I could somehow emphasize it more.  But when we approach any new work, I believe that we should filter it in light of our worldview, rather than amalgamating the author&#039;s worldview with our own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a mutual friend who gave a talk at Ministry Team (during the guy time) about thinking critically back when we were on MT together.  Not being negatively critical, but that we ought to critically examine every thought and idea, whether that be through works of fiction, TV, movies, art, conversation, etc.  IMHO, the idea of passively enjoying something &#8220;just for entertainment&#8221; is a veneer that is used to subversively shape people&#8217;s views on life.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t to say that fiction (and other forms of &#8220;entertainment&#8221;) shouldn&#8217;t be enjoyable; only that if we delude ourselves into thinking that what we enjoy has absolutely no effect upon how we view the world, we will find ourselves espousing views that we never knew we had.</p>
<p>Stories and other works of fiction are awesome &#8211; and I wish I could somehow emphasize it more.  But when we approach any new work, I believe that we should filter it in light of our worldview, rather than amalgamating the author&#8217;s worldview with our own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnica</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10595</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10595</guid>
		<description>@Valentine:  Definitely. Media, blogs, and the words out of our mouth definitely reflect our own bias.

@Cara: I bet they do, though that might not have been the intent of the author.  See Lillie&#039;s comment.

@Lillie: Couldn&#039;t say it better!

@Francesca: I wouldn&#039;t say blogs are fiction (unless they say they are), but they do express our worldview.

@Jennifer: I&#039;m glad someone noticed!  I think that might make fiction (and movies and TV) all the more dangerous as you don&#039;t know that you&#039;re being fed something you might not otherwise consume.

@Lady Fi: I think that all fiction affects on some level, even if it&#039;s a forgetable book.  It might be kinda like a little dust...not noticable in small quantities, but you do notice the cummulative affect.

@G. Zoe: Yes!  Thanks so much for commenting...now I don&#039;t have to keep your wonderful comments to myself!

@WhatACard: I always find it interesting when I like an author with a different worldview than I (and I know it).  Ayn Rand? She&#039;s a genius when it comes to fiction and blending her worldview.  But the problem is, it wouldn&#039;t work in real-life like it does in her fictional world.

@Julie: Seems like this could be a very lively debate if we all sat down in a room and discussed this!

@Irish: Ditto what I told Julie...and of course I agree!

@LiLu: So true!

@Iva: Well said.  And I&#039;m curious about your book!

@Elizabeth: I look forward to reading your feelings on feelings!

@Hillbilly: Unforunately, that&#039;s not my picture.  I would totally love those book shelves, though.  I think that we can express our worldview without even realizing it.

@Kim: I would say very few (in fact, I haven&#039;t found an instance)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Valentine:  Definitely. Media, blogs, and the words out of our mouth definitely reflect our own bias.</p>
<p>@Cara: I bet they do, though that might not have been the intent of the author.  See Lillie&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p>@Lillie: Couldn&#8217;t say it better!</p>
<p>@Francesca: I wouldn&#8217;t say blogs are fiction (unless they say they are), but they do express our worldview.</p>
<p>@Jennifer: I&#8217;m glad someone noticed!  I think that might make fiction (and movies and TV) all the more dangerous as you don&#8217;t know that you&#8217;re being fed something you might not otherwise consume.</p>
<p>@Lady Fi: I think that all fiction affects on some level, even if it&#8217;s a forgetable book.  It might be kinda like a little dust&#8230;not noticable in small quantities, but you do notice the cummulative affect.</p>
<p>@G. Zoe: Yes!  Thanks so much for commenting&#8230;now I don&#8217;t have to keep your wonderful comments to myself!</p>
<p>@WhatACard: I always find it interesting when I like an author with a different worldview than I (and I know it).  Ayn Rand? She&#8217;s a genius when it comes to fiction and blending her worldview.  But the problem is, it wouldn&#8217;t work in real-life like it does in her fictional world.</p>
<p>@Julie: Seems like this could be a very lively debate if we all sat down in a room and discussed this!</p>
<p>@Irish: Ditto what I told Julie&#8230;and of course I agree!</p>
<p>@LiLu: So true!</p>
<p>@Iva: Well said.  And I&#8217;m curious about your book!</p>
<p>@Elizabeth: I look forward to reading your feelings on feelings!</p>
<p>@Hillbilly: Unforunately, that&#8217;s not my picture.  I would totally love those book shelves, though.  I think that we can express our worldview without even realizing it.</p>
<p>@Kim: I would say very few (in fact, I haven&#8217;t found an instance)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10594</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10594</guid>
		<description>I think there are only very few times when fiction can only be fiction...most of the time it&#039;s there to mean something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are only very few times when fiction can only be fiction&#8230;most of the time it&#8217;s there to mean something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillbilly Duhn</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10593</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillbilly Duhn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088#comment-10593</guid>
		<description>Thank you for stopping by my blog.  Wanted to hop back and return the favor, and you seem to have snagged my attention...

Books. I love them.  The picture you have posted along with your post, the shelves, I have similar looking shelves.  Books of all kinds.  I don&#039;t stick to one kind, I read many for the value of the printed word.  Some can be romantic, others horrifying, some personal empowerment...

As for can fiction be just fiction, oh heck I think so. As an aspiring writer myself, I make up crap all the time. Fiction is after all works from the imagination...But I think that sometimes, to be a good writer, we use experiences from real life inside the fiction.  Thoughts, ego&#039;s, emotions...

Sorry I babbled... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for stopping by my blog.  Wanted to hop back and return the favor, and you seem to have snagged my attention&#8230;</p>
<p>Books. I love them.  The picture you have posted along with your post, the shelves, I have similar looking shelves.  Books of all kinds.  I don&#8217;t stick to one kind, I read many for the value of the printed word.  Some can be romantic, others horrifying, some personal empowerment&#8230;</p>
<p>As for can fiction be just fiction, oh heck I think so. As an aspiring writer myself, I make up crap all the time. Fiction is after all works from the imagination&#8230;But I think that sometimes, to be a good writer, we use experiences from real life inside the fiction.  Thoughts, ego&#8217;s, emotions&#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry I babbled&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

