<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Danger of the Adjective &#8220;Christian&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/</link>
	<description>&#34;by a partial, prejudiced, and ignorant historian,&#34; - Jane Austen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignorant Historian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book Trends I Want More or Less Of</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-18679</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignorant Historian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book Trends I Want More or Less Of</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 04:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-18679</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not saying that these have to be &#8220;Christian&#8221; fiction, nor do they necessarily have to be written by Christians. But I want to see more books with themes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m not saying that these have to be &#8220;Christian&#8221; fiction, nor do they necessarily have to be written by Christians. But I want to see more books with themes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignorant Historian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Self-Publishing</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-17026</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignorant Historian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Self-Publishing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-17026</guid>
		<description>[...] Another plus of self-publishing? I maintain control over how it&#8217;s branded.  Though my book clearly presents my beliefs, it makes me a little sick to think of my novel that I love dearly branded and marketed as &#8220;Christian fiction.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another plus of self-publishing? I maintain control over how it&#8217;s branded.  Though my book clearly presents my beliefs, it makes me a little sick to think of my novel that I love dearly branded and marketed as &#8220;Christian fiction.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber Hurd</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-14914</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber Hurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-14914</guid>
		<description>I agree with you I don&#039;t like it used as an adjective either. I prefer to call myself believer in Christ as well. Someone can label themselves a Christian and yet not be a follower of Christ at all.
.-= Amber Hurd´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BargainBabyMomma/~3/inD0c0bgPNQ/pampers-code.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pampers Code&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you I don&#8217;t like it used as an adjective either. I prefer to call myself believer in Christ as well. Someone can label themselves a Christian and yet not be a follower of Christ at all.<br />
.-= Amber Hurd´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BargainBabyMomma/~3/inD0c0bgPNQ/pampers-code.html" rel="nofollow">Pampers Code</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnica</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-10331</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-10331</guid>
		<description>@David: I want to be clear that I am NOT arguing for an inquisition/book burning type of thing at all, but rather for increased discernment in the lives of individuals and perhaps some restraint on the part of publishers and advertisers in the use of the term &quot;Christian.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David: I want to be clear that I am NOT arguing for an inquisition/book burning type of thing at all, but rather for increased discernment in the lives of individuals and perhaps some restraint on the part of publishers and advertisers in the use of the term &#8220;Christian.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-10330</link>
		<dc:creator>David Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-10330</guid>
		<description>I think things that contain heretical teachings can still be called christian if they follow Christ, despite their errors. The heretical teachings cannot be called true christian teachings, but the people themselves may still believe in Christ. Although I understand what the problem here is, because there are many things out there that are called &#039;christian&#039; which may be produced from a christian vantage-point but which contain errors in them that would hurt people&#039;s faith or lead them astray, or something, and people may inadvertantly buy that kind of product or whatever it is because it is called &#039;christian&#039; even though it may hurt them... this is a tricky thing indeed.

There used to be an institution that dealt with this sort of problem; it was called the inquisition and they published lists of books or other material printed by heretical christians that people should stay away from. That was the past though, and I question if such an institution could possibly work today when we have such a massive amount of information circling through the world. Even the Chinese government, which monitors internet usage, often finds itself incapable of censoring all the content that it would want censored.

Another problem though, is that if we don&#039;t use the term christian when something is christian and ought to be read, we may have difficulty directing chhristians to know it. 

I don&#039;t know if there is a way to solve this by our own efforts. I suppose we could pray to God and ask Him to help us with this.

Lord, help us with this and solve this problem in your eternal wisdom, amen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think things that contain heretical teachings can still be called christian if they follow Christ, despite their errors. The heretical teachings cannot be called true christian teachings, but the people themselves may still believe in Christ. Although I understand what the problem here is, because there are many things out there that are called &#8216;christian&#8217; which may be produced from a christian vantage-point but which contain errors in them that would hurt people&#8217;s faith or lead them astray, or something, and people may inadvertantly buy that kind of product or whatever it is because it is called &#8216;christian&#8217; even though it may hurt them&#8230; this is a tricky thing indeed.</p>
<p>There used to be an institution that dealt with this sort of problem; it was called the inquisition and they published lists of books or other material printed by heretical christians that people should stay away from. That was the past though, and I question if such an institution could possibly work today when we have such a massive amount of information circling through the world. Even the Chinese government, which monitors internet usage, often finds itself incapable of censoring all the content that it would want censored.</p>
<p>Another problem though, is that if we don&#8217;t use the term christian when something is christian and ought to be read, we may have difficulty directing chhristians to know it. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if there is a way to solve this by our own efforts. I suppose we could pray to God and ask Him to help us with this.</p>
<p>Lord, help us with this and solve this problem in your eternal wisdom, amen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnica</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-10307</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-10307</guid>
		<description>@Wickle: Exactly!

@Veronica and Iva:  Yeah, we definitely rely too heavily on labels.  I guess we want everything pre-discerned, but it doesn&#039;t work that way.

@Caity: Thanks...that&#039;s the biggest compliment I can get, that something I said made someone think!

@Jenny: Agreed.  Sure budget-issues can affect the quality of the equipment and materials used, but the content itself better be good!

@K-Lai: Rub it in, why don&#039;t ya?

@Joy: I don&#039;t like calling them Easter eggs either, though I love colored eggs.  If/when I have children, we will dye/hunt colored eggs as a spring holiday, separate from Resurrection Day.

@Dillow:  I&#039;m thankful to have pastors who practice what they preaches...and I&#039;ve learned as much from their walks as from their talks.

@Kristen and Melissa: While I didn&#039;t intend this post to be a warning against taking others at their word when they say &quot;Christian&quot; it is something to consider.  While it&#039;s not our place to deny/approve their faith, we can pick up clues from their words and actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wickle: Exactly!</p>
<p>@Veronica and Iva:  Yeah, we definitely rely too heavily on labels.  I guess we want everything pre-discerned, but it doesn&#8217;t work that way.</p>
<p>@Caity: Thanks&#8230;that&#8217;s the biggest compliment I can get, that something I said made someone think!</p>
<p>@Jenny: Agreed.  Sure budget-issues can affect the quality of the equipment and materials used, but the content itself better be good!</p>
<p>@K-Lai: Rub it in, why don&#8217;t ya?</p>
<p>@Joy: I don&#8217;t like calling them Easter eggs either, though I love colored eggs.  If/when I have children, we will dye/hunt colored eggs as a spring holiday, separate from Resurrection Day.</p>
<p>@Dillow:  I&#8217;m thankful to have pastors who practice what they preaches&#8230;and I&#8217;ve learned as much from their walks as from their talks.</p>
<p>@Kristen and Melissa: While I didn&#8217;t intend this post to be a warning against taking others at their word when they say &#8220;Christian&#8221; it is something to consider.  While it&#8217;s not our place to deny/approve their faith, we can pick up clues from their words and actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa B.</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-10306</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-10306</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you tackled this one today! I&#039;m from the Buckle of the Bible Belt (Dallas), and grew up with a long line of &quot;Christians&quot; who didn&#039;t behave like Christians at all. A bunch of big, fat hypocrites, is what I&#039;d call &#039;em! In fact, I don&#039;t even think Jesus would have wanted to hang with them, and he&#039;s the most forgiving person I know. And good for you-I agree with Kristen. This post makes us think. And that&#039;s always a good thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you tackled this one today! I&#8217;m from the Buckle of the Bible Belt (Dallas), and grew up with a long line of &#8220;Christians&#8221; who didn&#8217;t behave like Christians at all. A bunch of big, fat hypocrites, is what I&#8217;d call &#8216;em! In fact, I don&#8217;t even think Jesus would have wanted to hang with them, and he&#8217;s the most forgiving person I know. And good for you-I agree with Kristen. This post makes us think. And that&#8217;s always a good thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-10305</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-10305</guid>
		<description>Hey, I definitely agree with you.  I have met many people who call themselves Christians and their actions show me differently so I think we just need to be aware that even though something is labeled as&quot;Christian&quot; we do need to still guard our hearts until we find out for ourselves.  There are many &quot;Christians&quot; who call themselves that but still &quot;live of this world&quot; which as Christians we know we are not supposed to do.  Good job for having a post that makes you think.

P.s. I have an award for you @ my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I definitely agree with you.  I have met many people who call themselves Christians and their actions show me differently so I think we just need to be aware that even though something is labeled as&#8221;Christian&#8221; we do need to still guard our hearts until we find out for ourselves.  There are many &#8220;Christians&#8221; who call themselves that but still &#8220;live of this world&#8221; which as Christians we know we are not supposed to do.  Good job for having a post that makes you think.</p>
<p>P.s. I have an award for you @ my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The J Dillow</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-10304</link>
		<dc:creator>The J Dillow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-10304</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, the name Christian means Christ-like. The members of the early church were first called Christians because of their obvious resemblance to Jesus and His ministry. Today, before you can know a Christian, either they have ticked it on the form in answer to the question, ‘state your religion’ or they are caught church-going - neither of which identifies a ‘Christian’. Christian has now become a marketing term to attract those who classify themselves to be a part of Christendom, but the ideals of the original Christians were not set out by a cohort of self-help books by ‘Christian authors’, or by the latest album by the current gospel trend. These people were raw and untainted - a quality this unbelieving generation lacks by the gallon. Today, they have to introduce themselves as, ‘I’m a Christian’, instead of their works to speak for them. ‘By their fruit you shall know them’ is a common and unfortunately misinterpreted and watered down passage of scriptural wisdom. Sadly this misguided group consists highly of many modern day pastors who enjoy worldly lifestyles under the guise of Christian freedom and continue to teach their followers to do the same. It is few and far between where you find a pastor who talks the talk and walks the walk.  The truth still stands: faith without works is dead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, the name Christian means Christ-like. The members of the early church were first called Christians because of their obvious resemblance to Jesus and His ministry. Today, before you can know a Christian, either they have ticked it on the form in answer to the question, ‘state your religion’ or they are caught church-going &#8211; neither of which identifies a ‘Christian’. Christian has now become a marketing term to attract those who classify themselves to be a part of Christendom, but the ideals of the original Christians were not set out by a cohort of self-help books by ‘Christian authors’, or by the latest album by the current gospel trend. These people were raw and untainted &#8211; a quality this unbelieving generation lacks by the gallon. Today, they have to introduce themselves as, ‘I’m a Christian’, instead of their works to speak for them. ‘By their fruit you shall know them’ is a common and unfortunately misinterpreted and watered down passage of scriptural wisdom. Sadly this misguided group consists highly of many modern day pastors who enjoy worldly lifestyles under the guise of Christian freedom and continue to teach their followers to do the same. It is few and far between where you find a pastor who talks the talk and walks the walk.  The truth still stands: faith without works is dead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-10301</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1978#comment-10301</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t given this much thought before.  I&#039;ll take more notice.  I had a friend of mine who despised the phrase Easter eggs.  He would say they are eggs, just painted eggs.  Nothing to do with Easter...

He had his point too.

Joy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t given this much thought before.  I&#8217;ll take more notice.  I had a friend of mine who despised the phrase Easter eggs.  He would say they are eggs, just painted eggs.  Nothing to do with Easter&#8230;</p>
<p>He had his point too.</p>
<p>Joy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

