<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ignorant Historian &#187; Entertainment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/category/current-events/entertainment-current-events/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com</link>
	<description>&#34;by a partial, prejudiced, and ignorant historian,&#34; - Jane Austen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:00:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I Am Both Sisters</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2011/08/i-am-both-sisters/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2011/08/i-am-both-sisters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 04:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=7963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a secret that I like a good Jane Austen book or movie. The other day, I was in the mood, so I popped in Sense and Sensibility (you know, the one with Hugh Grant). Sense and Sensibility is both my favorite Jane Austen book and my favorite movie. I love Pride [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-7964" href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2011/08/i-am-both-sisters/sense_and_sensibility/"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-7964" title="sense_and_sensibility" src="http://ignoranthistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sense_and_sensibility-416x625.jpg" alt="" width="291" height="438" /></a>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a secret that I like a good Jane Austen book or movie. The other day, I was in the mood, so I popped in <em>Sense and Sensibility</em> (you know, the one with Hugh Grant).</p>
<p><em>Sense and Sensibility</em> is both my favorite Jane Austen book and my favorite movie. I love <em>Pride and Prejudice </em>along with the best of us, but <em>Sense and Sensibility</em> resonates more with me, because I relate to both of the sisters.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a lot like Elinor, the put-together, sensible, putting-others-first rock of the family. To those who don&#8217;t know me well, I can come across as stoic or unfeeling. I tend towards order and routine and tend to shy away from spontaneity and anything that upsets my order for things.</p>
<p>But I also am a lot like Marianne. I can be flighty and overly emotional. I cry quicker than anyone I know (though I still blame it on a physical abnormality&#8230;doncha know I have overactive tear ducts?). I have thought my world was falling apart when a suitor hasn&#8217;t appeared. I have interpreted my interactions with a man to make them into something they weren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>You see, I&#8217;m both sisters. I can be both sensible and overcome by sensibility.</p>
<p>And for the record, Colonel Brandon is by far my favorite of the Jane Austen&#8217;s heroes. A man who doesn&#8217;t arrogantly assume you think he&#8217;s all that, prefers you to be happy than to be with him (as much as it pains him), and is willing to quietly serve in whatever way possible? Yes, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2011/08/i-am-both-sisters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Books I&#8217;d Like to See Made Into Movies</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2011/04/10-books-id-like-to-see-made-into-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2011/04/10-books-id-like-to-see-made-into-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 04:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Ten Tuesday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=7154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s Top Ten Tuesday topic is books that we&#8217;d like to see turned into movies. Of course, when I think of books that I&#8217;d like to be turned into movies, I think about how I want these books turned into movies the way I want them to be, but I supposed I wouldn&#8217;t be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s <a href="http://brokeandbookish.blogspot.com/search/label/Top%20Ten%20Tuesday">Top Ten Tuesday</a> topic is books that we&#8217;d like to see turned into movies. Of course, when I think of books that I&#8217;d like to be turned into movies, I think about how I want these books turned into movies <em>the way I want them to be</em>, but I supposed I wouldn&#8217;t be consulted on any of these movie projects. It&#8217;s just that each book made me feel a certain way, and I&#8217;d want the movie to do the same.</p>
<p>Actually, several of the books that I want to be made into movies are in the process of being turned into movies. While it used to be important to me that movies reflect the books perfectly, I&#8217;ve since realized it makes more sense for the them not to be exactly the same. After all, what makes a book good and what makes a movie good aren&#8217;t the same things.</p>
<p>So, these are books I want to see made into movies (or movies that I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing):</p>
<p><strong>1. <em>Ender&#8217;s Game</em> by Orson Scott Card</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve wanted to see a movie of <em>Ender&#8217;s Game</em> ever since I read it for the first time. I think that it has the makings of a very good movie that would have mass popularity. Card has/is writing a script for it, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s gone much farther than that.</p>
<p><strong>2. <em>Tomorrow, When the War Began</em> by John Marsden</strong></p>
<p>Okay, so this <em>is</em> already a movie&#8230;in Australia (where it did well). No word on whether it will be released in the US in the theaters or on DVD.</p>
<p><strong>3. <em>The City and the City</em> by China Miévelle</strong></p>
<p>I think this would be a fascinated movie, if someone could pull it off. Having two cities overlapping&#8211;and yet you&#8217;re only allowed to &#8220;see&#8221; your own city&#8211;would possibly require some <em>Inception</em>-like visuals.</p>
<p><strong>4. <em>The Journal </em>by&#8230;well&#8230;me</strong></p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t that be absolutely cool? A girl can dream. But seriously, it could make a great movie I think. I love futuristic movies, and this would definitely be one.</p>
<p><strong>5. <em>Hunger Games</em> by Suzanne Collins</strong></p>
<p>If you like <em>Hunger Games</em> at all, you&#8217;ve likely heard that this is going to be a movie. The casting of the main characters has just been released, so it&#8217;ll still be a while. I think that it makes for a great story for film, but it&#8217;d be hard to not to make it gory.</p>
<p><strong>6.<em> Mysterious Benedict Society</em> by Trenton Lee Stewart</strong></p>
<p>A great story that&#8217;d make for a great kids&#8217; movie.</p>
<p><strong>7. <em>Uglies </em>by Scott Westerfeld</strong></p>
<p>Based on this list, I think I need to watch more sci-fi movies. I love seeing other people&#8217;s imaginations at work in how they create a future society.</p>
<p><strong>8. <em>When You Reach Me</em> by Rebecca Stead</strong></p>
<p>If this would be as touching a story on film as it is in print, I&#8217;d love to see it happen.</p>
<p><strong>9. C. S. Lewis&#8217;s Space Trilogy</strong></p>
<p>Why not follow up The Chronicles of Narnia with Lewis&#8217;s lesser-known fiction series? There are some really poignant points in the books that I&#8217;d love to see on film, though I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;d make for very popular movies as the books aren&#8217;t nearly as action-packed and suspense-filled as most alien movies out there.</p>
<p><strong>10. <em>The Knife of Never Letting Go</em> by Patrick Ness</strong></p>
<p>This series, on the other hand, would make for an action-packed alien movie.</p>
<p><strong>Would you/do you want to see any of these movies?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2011/04/10-books-id-like-to-see-made-into-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV is Rotting My Brain</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2010/06/tv-is-rotting-my-brain/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2010/06/tv-is-rotting-my-brain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=4946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so the title is overly dramatic, not to mention cliché. But I can&#8217;t help but think that the amount of TV I&#8217;ve watched in the last couple of months isn&#8217;t healthy.  I don&#8217;t feel I watch excessively (maybe an average of 10-12 hours a week&#8230;you all know how much I read, but that still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4947" href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2010/06/tv-is-rotting-my-brain/old_tv/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4947" title="old_TV" src="http://ignoranthistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/old_TV.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="266" /></a>Okay, so the title is overly dramatic, not to mention cliché.</p>
<p>But I can&#8217;t help but think that the amount of TV I&#8217;ve watched in the last couple of months isn&#8217;t healthy.  I don&#8217;t feel I watch excessively (maybe an average of 10-12 hours a week&#8230;you all know <a href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/books-books-books/books-read-in-2010/">how much I read</a>, but that still sounds like a lot), but I still feel too tied to that little gray box, or really, the little gray computer screen.</p>
<p>I hate being tied to a TV show.  Yet shows like <em>24,</em> <em>Glee</em>, and <em>So You Think You Can Dance</em> &#8220;make&#8221; me come back week after week.  And then there are all the crime shows that suck me in.</p>
<p>During finale season, I repeatedly cringed as conversation after conversation, online and off, dealt with this show or that show.  And then just the other day we had some friends over, and the group of us sat around discussing TV for about an hour.  We could have intelligently discussed any number of topics, but we went for the lowest common denominator (and I definitely was a part of the problem on this one).</p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t like about TV&#8230;it IS the lowest common denominator, rarely challenging.  There&#8217;s nothing inherently wrong with it, sure.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with mindlessly relaxing occassionally, but <a href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2010/05/intentionally-illiterate/">a book</a> can have the same affect while improving your vocabulary and reading abilities without you even realizing it.</p>
<p>Like most things, TV&#8217;s best in moderation with a healthy dose of discernment and critical thinking.  Moderation has<a href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2010/04/food-is-not-my-god/"> never been something that I&#8217;ve been good at</a>.  If I start watching TV any given evening, I&#8217;m not likely to stop before going to bed (late).  So I&#8217;ve been trying <em>not</em> to start.  Aside from the previously-mentioned <em>SYTYCD </em>(hey, at least dancing is &#8220;the arts&#8221;), I don&#8217;t want to watch any TV during the week.</p>
<p>By cutting out a lot of my TV watching, I&#8217;ll be able to keep up my reading habit <em>and </em> be social (obv not at the same time).  And if I know what&#8217;s good for me, I&#8217;ll throw in some exercise, too.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/schmilblick/">schmilblick</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2010/06/tv-is-rotting-my-brain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Edward is Not My Dream Man</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/12/why-edward-is-not-my-dream-man/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/12/why-edward-is-not-my-dream-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, forgive me.  If you&#8217;re a Twilighter, you won&#8217;t like this post as I&#8217;ll be dissing Edward.  If you&#8217;re not a Twilighter, then you won&#8217;t like this post because I&#8217;m going to talk about Twilight.  So basically, you have to have the exact same opinion as me (And why wouldn&#8217;t you if you have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, forgive me.  If you&#8217;re a Twilighter, you won&#8217;t like this post as I&#8217;ll be dissing Edward.  If you&#8217;re not a Twilighter, then you won&#8217;t like this post because I&#8217;m going to talk about Twilight.  So basically, you have to have the exact same opinion as me (And why wouldn&#8217;t you if you have been reading my blog, right? I&#8217;m incredibly persuasive.) to enjoy this post.</p>
<p>I do realize that this post is at least a few weeks late, if not years.  Still, I wrote it now.  Actually, I&#8217;m rather pleased that I wrote anything &#8220;real&#8221; this week at all.</p>
<p>I read <em>Twilight </em>a couple of months ago after the umpteenth suggestion.  Didn&#8217;t hate it, but didn&#8217;t like it, either.  Over Thanksgiving break, I significantly miscalculated the number of books I&#8217;d need (I guessed 3, but 2 were youth books, so bad call) so I needed something to read.  Knowing my mom had <em>New Moon</em>, I thought I might as well continue the series.</p>
<p>After reading these two tomes, I still don&#8217;t get what it is about Edward that people like. At all.  In the interest of full disclosure, my ideal man-in-a-book/movie is Edmund in <em>Mansfield Park </em>(the movie, not necessarily the book).</p>
<p><strong>9 Reasons Why I Couldn&#8217;t Like Edward</strong></p>
<p>1. He&#8217;s pale as all get out.  Sure, being pale isn&#8217;t necessarily a bad thing (though I must admit I like my guys darker), but I don&#8217;t see how it&#8217;s a good thing, either.</p>
<p>2.  He&#8217;s a stalker.  Sure, Bella eventually gave permission for Edward to watch her all-night (like that isn&#8217;t creepy itself), but he did it before without asking.</p>
<p>3.  He sparkles.  If someone is going to sparkle in a relationship, it better be me.</p>
<p>4.  He&#8217;s mopey.  Sure, we all can be sometimes, but he seems to be too much (Bella, you too).</p>
<p>5.  He&#8217;s hard. How is that cuddly?</p>
<p>6.  He doesn&#8217;t bother to check his facts before making a big decision (killing himself).</p>
<p>7.  He likes Bella &#8217;cause she smells good. That isn&#8217;t shallow&#8230;</p>
<p>8.  Other than these things, what else do we know about him?</p>
<p>9.  And then there&#8217;s something about being non-human&#8230;what was that again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/12/why-edward-is-not-my-dream-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fleeting Pleasures</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/08/fleeting-pleasures/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/08/fleeting-pleasures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Historical Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedonism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleasure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a big fan of romantic comedies, but if I watch another movie where hedonism (the search for pleasure) is the final answer, I might scream. I already talked about how sex isn&#8217;t everything.  Well, on a related point, neither is pleasure.  The adage, &#8220;Do what makes you happy&#8221; might well define our culture, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2290" title="Las Vegas" src="http://ignoranthistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Las-Vegas-mandj98-300x200.jpg" alt="Las Vegas" width="300" height="200" />I&#8217;m a big fan of romantic comedies, but if I watch another movie where hedonism (the search for pleasure) is the final answer, I might scream.</p>
<p>I already talked about how sex isn&#8217;t everything.  Well, on a related point, neither is pleasure.  The adage, &#8220;Do what makes you happy&#8221; might well define our culture, but that doesn&#8217;t make it right or true.</p>
<p>I think for any of us who have tried to follow this (and I think most have at one point or another) find that the pleasures that we seek never fully satisfy, are never enough.  Just like the alcoholic wants one more drink, and Rockefeller, one of the richest men of his time, says that enough money is &#8220;just a little bit more,&#8221; we want &#8220;just a little bit more&#8221; of whatever we&#8217;ve determined will make us happy.  If it&#8217;s someone, we might smother them.  If it&#8217;s something, we might poison ourselves or drown ourselves in debt to get it.</p>
<p>Instead of pursuing my own pleasures (and I&#8217;m more than willing to admit that I do that all too often), I&#8217;d rather seek to obey the greatest commandments:</p>
<p>&#8221; &#8216;You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.&#8217;  This is the great and foremost commandment.  The second is like it, &#8216;You shall love your neighbor as yourself.&#8217; &#8221; &#8211; Matthew 22:37-39</p>
<p>And perhaps I&#8217;ll stick to <em>24</em>.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mandj98/" target="_self">mandj98</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/08/fleeting-pleasures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiction is Just Fiction?</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love to read.  That&#8217;s nothing new.  Many of you read, too.  There&#8217;s two major reasons why we read: to learn and to be entertained. Yet, even the reading for entertainment requires discernment.  Though I&#8217;m just a baby fiction writer (&#8220;embryo&#8221; might be the better term&#8230;a complete novel has yet to be birthed), I know that part of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2089" title="books and TV" src="http://ignoranthistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/books-and-TV-swruler9284-300x225.jpg" alt="books and TV" width="300" height="225" />I love to read.  That&#8217;s nothing new.  Many of you read, too.  There&#8217;s two major reasons why we read: to learn and to be entertained.</p>
<p>Yet, even the reading for entertainment requires <a href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/the-danger-of-the-adjective-christian/" target="_self">discernment</a>.  Though I&#8217;m just a baby fiction writer (&#8220;embryo&#8221; might be the better term&#8230;a complete novel has yet to be birthed), I know that part of why I write is to express my worldview.  Even if that wasn&#8217;t my obvious goal, my worldview is bound to work itself into the piece.  Even the more entertainment-only authors still express a <a href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/tag/worldview/" target="_self">worldview</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t buy arguments for books like <em><a title="My review of The Shack" href="http://booknookclub.blogspot.com/2008/06/shack-by-william-young.html" target="_self">The Shack</a></em> that say, &#8220;It&#8217;s just fiction&#8221; as if that&#8217;s code for &#8220;no thinking allowed&#8221; or &#8220;for entertainment purposes only.&#8221;  I imagine William Young would take offense if you were to tell him that it was a great story but nothing more.  I don&#8217;t want to speak for him, but I&#8217;m pretty sure he <em>meant</em> there to be a deeper purpose behind his writing than just a pleasant way to spend an afternoon.  It&#8217;s the same thing for many other books and authors, though it might not be as clear.</p>
<p>Lest you TV-watchers and movie-goers think you&#8217;re in the clear, these forms of media are also excellent conductors of worldview.  Possibly more so, since we tend to be in a more passive position (rather like a sponge) when we&#8217;re imbibing them.  I love these types of visual entertainment, but I also enjoy parsing them a bit.  I listen for key value statements and look for stereotypes.  The world of a show or movie is often what the creator makes it&#8230;is there a part of reality that has been written out?</p>
<p>When I see these things, I ponder them, and when I have a <a href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/my-weekend-with-a-14yo-roommate/" target="_self">young, captive audience</a>, I&#8217;ll point them out, too.  Thankfully, Lana didn&#8217;t mind me pausing the movie to point out something&#8230;like how often the <em>Star Wars</em> characters entreat each other to look to their feelings for validation (more often on the dark side, but both do it) as if that was the final source of truth.</p>
<p>So what do you think&#8230;do you think fiction can just be fiction?</p>
<p><em>Photo by </em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/swruler/" target="_self"><em>swruler9284</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/06/fiction-is-just-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m a TV Weanie</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/01/im-a-tv-weanie/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/01/im-a-tv-weanie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like to watch television, I really do.  I know most of you do, too.  But over the last year or so, I&#8217;ve realized that I had to cut out watching shows that I just must see.  I don&#8217;t have a DVR, so if I watch TV, it must be live.  I found that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to watch television, I really do.  I know most of you do, too.  But over the last year or so, I&#8217;ve realized that I had to cut out watching shows that I just <em>must </em>see.  I don&#8217;t have a DVR, so if I watch TV, it must be live.  I found that I was limiting social opportunities because I couldn&#8217;t plan things on certain nights/times because I would miss my shows.  The hardest ones to miss, I found, were reality shows (Survivor, the Amazing Race, and American Idol), because I didn&#8217;t want to miss what happened each week.</p>
<p>I still occasionally catch 30 Rock, Numb3rs, or a CSI, but these don&#8217;t require me to watch every episode.  I make them a treat for when I happen to be home at that time and don&#8217;t have anything else pressing.  I also have started watching Jeopardy and Wheel of Fortune, because they come on during my typical dinnertime downtime and don&#8217;t require close, or regular watching.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s really only two exceptions: sports (for obvious reasons, but I only <em>have </em>to watch Big XII football and the NCAA tournament when they&#8217;re on) and in the summer, for SYTYCD because it IS the summer, and my friends like to watch it with me.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel I need to cut TV watching out of my life completely, but I have limited it.  I don&#8217;t have to watch TV everyday, and more often than not, I&#8217;d rather read than watch TV anyway.  Since I&#8217;ve weaned myself off of must-see TV, I guess you could call me a TV weanie.</p>
<p>What show would you find to be the hardest to give up watching?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/01/im-a-tv-weanie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercials Shmercials</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/01/commercials-shmercials/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/01/commercials-shmercials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not a fan of commercials or advertisements, period, but the commercials that are bugging me the most right now (from watching football) are the commercials for car insurance.  They all seem to have this &#8220;those that switch to us have saved an average of $XXX&#8221; approach (well, except Geico; they have some great commercials!).  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of commercials or advertisements, period, but the commercials that are bugging me the most right now (from watching football) are the commercials for car insurance.  They all seem to have this &#8220;those that switch to us have saved an average of $XXX&#8221; approach (well, except Geico; they have some great commercials!).  The thing is, you&#8217;re not likely to switch car insurance <em>unless</em> you&#8217;re going to save money.  So it&#8217;s not like the average person will necessarily save move by switching to them, it&#8217;s just that they&#8217;re saying that those that could save money, switched.</p>
<p>On the other hand, there was a commercial in Kansas when I was there over Thanksgiving that I enjoyed.  It was a car commercial, no less.  Sadly, it betrays my lowbrow sense of humor.</p>
<p>Why did it make me laugh?</p>
<p>It had a dancing chicken.  A person, dresed in a chicken costume, dancing next to the cars they were selling.  Something that would <a href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/05/an-irrational-fear/" target="_self">terrify me in real life</a>, made me laugh on screen, and I don&#8217;t know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/01/commercials-shmercials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Can Be Funny</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/03/facebook-can-be-funny/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/03/facebook-can-be-funny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/03/facebook-can-be-funny/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you heard that the Facebook guy, Mark Zuckerberg, is worth $1.5 billion at the ripe old age of 23? There&#8217;s a reason for it. Facebook is one of the few Internet sites that is able to specifically target marketing. If you want to run an ad, you can ask that it be run specifically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard that the Facebook guy, Mark Zuckerberg, is worth $1.5 billion at the ripe old age of 23?  There&#8217;s a reason for it.  Facebook is one of the few Internet sites that is able to specifically target marketing.  If you want to run an ad, you can ask that it be run specifically for females between the age of 25-30 that like reading and are located in the Raleigh area, for example.  Since you fill out your interests, age, gender, location, relationship status, etc. on your profile, these ads can be strategically placed in the viewing of prospective clients.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what worries me about the ads that I get.  They seem to have me pegged (mostly).  I get a lot of advertisements for dating sites (one was even specifically targeted for people 25 and up!) and travel opportunities.  Other ads, well, I just don&#8217;t know about.</p>
<p>Here are a few:</p>
<p>&#8220;Cause of belly fat&#8221; with a picture of man&#8217;s six-pack.  Even if I were to say, want to lose some of my belly fat, I don&#8217;t want my stomach to look like THAT.  I get lots of more targeted ads for weight loss (one I saw today said simply, &#8220;You fat?&#8221;) which makes me wonder, has Facebook figured out my BMI based on the pictures I have on there?  I&#8217;d really rather not know!</p>
<p>&#8220;Bald hair creme&#8221; with a picture of the top of a bald man&#8217;s head.  Um, I&#8217;m not a man, and I have plenty of hair.  Shouldn&#8217;t this ad have been targeted to someone else?</p>
<p>I get the same &#8220;Meet 5 guys&#8221; ad that <a href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/2007/11/woo-me/">I talked about before</a>, but I actually got one that had pictures on it&#8230;of FOUR guys.  Is the fifth supposed guy so anxious to meet me too ugly to include his picture?</p>
<p>On the dating topic, one of the more pointed ads advertised &#8220;find your husband.&#8221;  I wish it were that easy!</p>
<p>One I got this morning was just strange.  It was for Jansport, the backpack company: &#8220;Wherever you go please take us with you.&#8221;  Nope, I like my old backpack of a competitive brand just fine don&#8217;t travel without it.  If I brought you along too you&#8217;d probably just get in a fight when I wasn&#8217;t looking.  Plus I&#8217;d have to carry one on the front, which would just be suspicious as I go through security.</p>
<p>Another totally random ad was for Philadelphia real estate.  I live in North Carolina, why would I buy a house in Philadelphia?</p>
<p>What funny ads have you seen online?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/03/facebook-can-be-funny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated: Who Said That? Movie Quotes!</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/03/updated-who-said-that-movie-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/03/updated-who-said-that-movie-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/03/updated-who-said-that-movie-quotes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[**Looks like I stumped you all on 6, 8, and 20! All the answers are now below&#8230;thanks for playing!** I&#8217;m nothing if not a follower. When Debra posted quotes from her favorite movies and asked us to guess, I knew I had to do the same. I had planned on listing favorite movie quotes anyway, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>**Looks like I stumped you all on 6, 8, and 20! All the answers are now below&#8230;thanks for playing!**</em></strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m nothing if not a follower. When Debra posted quotes from her favorite movies and asked us to guess, I knew I had to do the same. I had planned on listing favorite movie quotes anyway, but this way just makes it fun.</p>
<p>How well do you know your movies? Some of them I know are easy (especially if you like the same movies as me!) and some are hard. Leave a comment with your guesses/answers. Don&#8217;t look them up, just guess! I&#8217;ll give you hints if you ask. Let&#8217;s see how well you do!</p>
<p>1. &#8220;I know you can be overwhelmed, and you can be underwhelmed, but can you ever just be whelmed?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I think you can in Europe.&#8221;<br />
- <em>10 Things I Hate About You<br />
</em><br />
2. &#8220;Where&#8217;s Elizabeth?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;She&#8217;s safe, just like I promised. She&#8217;s all set to marry <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error">Norrington</span>, just like she promised. And you get to die for her, just like you promised. So we&#8217;re all men of our word, really. Except Elizabeth, who is in fact, a woman.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl</em></p>
<p>3. &#8220;If I were Hitler you&#8217;d give me my father. If I were Hitler, you&#8217;d give me your country!&#8221;<br />
- <em>Forget Paris</em></p>
<p>4. &#8220;Ain&#8217;t nobody gonna pick up three filthy, <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-error">unshaved</span> hitchhikers and one of them a know-it-all that can&#8217;t keep his trap shut.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Pete, the personal rancor reflected in that remark I don&#8217;t intend to dignify with comment. But I would like to address your general attitude of hopeless negativism.&#8221;<br />
- <em>O Brother, Where Art Thou?</em></p>
<p>5. &#8220;You called everyone but Slurpee Heaven.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;That&#8217;s not true. I did call Slurpee Heaven. They didn&#8217;t want you. Heard you had attitude. Said you weren&#8217;t Slurpee material.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Two Weeks Notice</em></p>
<p><strong>6. &#8220;My mom never hid the fact that my dad chose his career over us. What was it she always said?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Once a <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-error">carnie</span>, always a <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error">carnie</span>.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Mom still cries <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-corrected">every time</span> she sees a tilt-a-whirl or a fat lady in a tube top.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Drop Dead Gorgeous</em></strong></p>
<p>7. &#8220;I&#8217;m making you taller. Don&#8217;t you want to be taller? You&#8217;re a midget in 34 states.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Yeah, well, I&#8217;m an animal in the other 34&#8230;24&#8230;22.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Ocean&#8217;s 13</em></p>
<p><strong>8. [in a letter to a woman who loves him] &#8220;She is the only woman in the world whom I could ever think of as a wife.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Mansfield Park</em></strong></p>
<p>9. &#8220;I cannot remember a time before you started telling that story.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I was asked to provide a detailed explanation of the evening.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;And you did, Rosie, you really did. I really felt like I was there&#8230;sort of against my will.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Win a Date with Tad Hamilton</em></p>
<p>10. &#8220;It&#8217;s my choice not to go. I could have gone. He would have supported it.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;But you don&#8217;t have to choose.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;No, I have to. I want a home; I want a family, that&#8217;s just not something I&#8217;ll sacrifice.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Mona Lisa Smile</em></p>
<p>11. &#8220;Laws don&#8217;t touch men like Thaddeus Rains. Only justice does.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Whose justice, yours or God&#8217;s?&#8221;<br />
- <em>American Outlaws</em><br />
<em></em><br />
12. &#8220;I have great insight. I&#8217;d use it on myself, only I don&#8217;t have any problems.&#8221;<br />
<em>- Music and Lyrics</em></p>
<p>13. &#8220;Do we have to use that term?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;What term?&#8221;<br />
&#8221; &#8216;Freak.&#8217; The National Institute of Mental Health estimates that&#8230;percent of adults develop <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-error">agraphoraphobia</span>.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Agoraphobia.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Whatever. I&#8217;m just saying, I mean, do we need to be an organization that labels people?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Now we&#8217;re an organization?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;You&#8217;d call Emily Dickinson a freak?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Are you hosting a telethon I don&#8217;t know about?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Who&#8217;s Emily Dickinson?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Am I the only one who feels funny about stealing from a handicapped guy?&#8221;<br />
- <em>Ocean&#8217;s 12</em></p>
<p>14. &#8220;To lose one parent, Mr. <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_6" class="blsp-spelling-error">Worthing</span>, may be regarded as a misfortune. To lose both looks like carelessness.&#8221;<br />
- <em>The Importance of Being Earnest</em></p>
<p>15. &#8220;Do you have an ethical problem with rifling through a woman&#8217;s purse?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_7" class="blsp-spelling-error">Uhh</span>, yeah, I guess I do.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Well, it&#8217;s hardly a purse. Dude, it&#8217;s more like a clutch or something.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Guys, a woman&#8217;s purse, alright, it&#8217;s her secret source of power. Alright? There are many dark and dangerous things in there, that we, the male species, should know nothing about.&#8221;<br />
- <em>How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days</em></p>
<p>16. &#8220;It&#8217;s been many years since I&#8217;ve had such an exemplary vegetable.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Pride and Prejudice</em></p>
<p>17. &#8220;I just don&#8217;t think that Brooke <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_8" class="blsp-spelling-error">could&#8217;ve</span> done this. Exercise gives you endorphins. Endorphins make you happy. Happy people just don&#8217;t shoot their husbands, they just don&#8217;t.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Legally Blonde</em></p>
<p>18. &#8220;A flower is good for nothing. You can&#8217;t eat a flower, a flower can&#8217;t keep you warm&#8230;&#8221;<br />
&#8220;And a rose never knocked a man off a horse either.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;You&#8217;re just a silly girl aren&#8217;t you?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Better a silly girl with a flower than a silly man with a horse and a stick.&#8221;<br />
- <em>A Knight&#8217;s Tale</em></p>
<p>19. &#8220;So, uh, who told you?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Uh, who told me what?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;You found out, didn&#8217;t you?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;We still have time for one more interview&#8230;&#8221;<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s called leukemia&#8230;and yeah, I would like to come with you, but are you just asking me because you feel sorry for me?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8230;maybe.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Okay.&#8221;<br />
- <em>Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants</em></p>
<p><strong>20. &#8220;Aren&#8217;t you going to congratulate me?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Congratulations.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Aren&#8217;t you going to ask what for?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;What for?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;ve made a great decision. I&#8217;ve decided to get married.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;My! Who to?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;That part is yet to be decided.&#8221;</strong><br />
<strong>- <em>An Ideal Husband</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2008/03/updated-who-said-that-movie-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

