Review: Faithful Heart by Al Lacy
Posted in Academic Pursuits on 02/26/2010 12:56 am by Ronnica
While this review is talking about this book specifically, the points I make aren’t directed at Al Lacy exclusively. Most of these issues are common faults found with the bulk of “Christian” fiction.
I received a review copy of Faithful Heart from Multnomah. I thought it sounded like an interesting book, set in the western US in the 1870s. There’s basically two storylines following two sisters: one who is making a trek west via wagon train and the other who is struggling being married to a man dealing with violent mental issues related to his Civil War service.
Al Lacy’s not a bad writer necessarily, but this book is a great example of Christian fiction gone bad. While Lacy does try to tackle a real-life issue (mental illness) and I commend him for that, he goes about it all wrong.
First, the answer given for the mental problem is seeking professional help (as pointed out by each and every character). Laying aside how strange this seems in the 1870s setting and the horrors that were mental health asylums in that day, this is just poor theology. Perhaps you, my reader, wouldn’t agree with that, but I believe that the Bible is all sufficient for our needs. Though a psychiatrist may offer valuable help, that’s not the first place to go.
Secondly, this book is chock full with church-y language. The conversations between characters come off as untrue to real life, like a play written by an amateur (me, for instance). Like most Christians who’ve been around the church a lot I’m guilty of this as well, but it does make me cringe. There is a way to write a story from a biblical worldview without making it sound like it was written in a Sunday School. The God of the Bible is so much more than that.
My last major issue with this book is that everything is tied up in a neat bow. While that might be the way we would like things, real life doesn’t work that way and we fool ourselves when we place hope that it will. Mental illness is messy. Even more so, our sin nature is (which we rarely see in this book aside from the “bad” guys).
To be fair, this was originally published 25 years ago. Perhaps Lacy wouldn’t have written the book this way if he wrote it today. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt on this matter.

I can’t imagine how this could shock any of my regular readers, but I’d never get a tattoo. Though I might come off as strict and traditional, it really has nothing (or at least little) to do with my spiritual beliefs. Tattoos simply don’t interest me.
