<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ignorant Historian &#187; Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ignoranthistorian.com/tag/debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com</link>
	<description>&#34;by a partial, prejudiced, and ignorant historian,&#34; - Jane Austen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:00:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Case for Civil Discourse</title>
		<link>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/08/a-case-for-civil-discourse/</link>
		<comments>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/08/a-case-for-civil-discourse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ignoranthistorian.com/?p=2375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Civility (n) &#8211; politeness, the act of showing regard for others Civility&#8230;that&#8217;s a good word, no?  Then why is it sorely lacking from political debate in this country? I love a good discussion.  Whether I&#8217;m discussing an issue with someone who I mostly agree with or with someone I mostly disagree with,  I believe it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2376" title="yelling baby" src="http://ignoranthistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/yelling-baby-jenn-jenn-199x300.jpg" alt="yelling baby" width="199" height="300" /><a href="http://wordnet.princeton.edu/">Civility</a></strong><strong> (n) &#8211; politeness, the act of showing regard for others</strong></p>
<p>Civility&#8230;that&#8217;s a good word, no?  Then why is it sorely lacking from political debate in this country?</p>
<p>I love a good discussion.  Whether I&#8217;m discussing an issue with someone who I mostly agree with or with someone I mostly disagree with,  I believe it&#8217;s healthy to question and examine one&#8217;s assumptions.  It&#8217;s rare that my views are not changed or at least fine-tuned after a discussion of an important matter.  Being forced to state my views in a comprehensible way helps me realize my argument&#8217;s weaknesses and recognize any unfounded and unjustified claims.</p>
<p>So why do people think that yelling at one another and calling one another names is a good thing?  Why do they think that this is &#8220;debate?&#8221;  Why are talk radio shows and cable news programs filled with venomous, vacuous speech?  Do they even think it&#8217;s helpful, or is their only aim to disrupt their sworn enemies (because we&#8217;re really at war and there can be no middle ground)?</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m naive, but I believe that there is a place for meaningful debate.  That doesn&#8217;t mean that we&#8217;ll walk away from the table at the end of the day with the same opinions, but we can walk away with a greater respect and understanding of one another and an idea on the things that we <em>can</em> agree on.  While I don&#8217;t agree with the President on many of the issues, I share his belief that there is a place for meaningful discussion beyond party, religious, cultural, and racial differences.  I believe our country would be a better place if more people believed this, but I also believe that the sinfulness of man will always taint how we relate to one another.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cheesepicklescheese/">Jenn Jenn</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ignoranthistorian.com/2009/08/a-case-for-civil-discourse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

